Appeals And Disputes

Step Therapy And Why Plans Require It

Why some health plans ask patients to try one treatment before another, how step therapy typically works, and what exceptions or appeals may exist.

On this page
  1. What step therapy means
  2. Why plans use it
  3. How it typically works in practice
  4. Circumstances that may justify an exception
  5. Requesting an exception or appealing
  6. Weighing the trade-offs

What step therapy means

Step therapy is a plan rule that asks a patient to try one treatment, usually a lower-cost or more established one, before the plan will pay for another. Think of a staircase: you begin on the first step, and the plan covers the next step only if the first did not work well enough, was not tolerated, or was not suitable. It is sometimes called a fail-first policy, though the name is not always fair, as the aim is a sequence, not failure.

It most commonly applies to medications, though plans can use similar sequencing for other services. Policies vary by insurer, plan, employer and place, and some jurisdictions regulate how step therapy may be used. This is general information, not medical, insurance or legal advice.

Why plans use it

Plans generally describe step therapy as serving a few goals:

  • Cost management. A lower-priced option, often a generic, may work well for many people. Starting there can reduce spending for the plan and for members through lower cost sharing. The savings logic is similar to generic drug savings.
  • Following established practice. Some conditions have a commonly accepted first-line treatment, with newer or more intensive options reserved for those who need them.
  • Safety and monitoring. Beginning with a well-understood treatment can make it easier to see how a patient responds before moving on.
  • Managing use of high-cost treatments. Specialty or newer drugs can be very expensive, so plans may add conditions to their use.

Critics point out that patients are not identical and that insisting on a sequence can delay effective treatment, particularly where a person has already tried a drug under a previous plan. Both views are part of the ongoing debate, and it is reasonable to understand each.

How it typically works in practice

  1. Prescription is written. Your clinician prescribes a medication or service.
  2. The pharmacy or office hits a rule. The claim is rejected or flagged with a message that another treatment must be tried first, or that approval is needed.
  3. Plan criteria are checked. The plan looks for a record of the earlier step, often through your claims history or documentation from the clinician.
  4. Outcome. If the earlier step was tried, the plan may approve the requested drug. If not, it may deny the request or invite you to start on the first step.

The details are usually listed in the plan’s drug list (formulary) or its coverage policies. This links closely with your overall coverage for prescription drugs, and many step therapy rules are enforced through prior authorization.

Circumstances that may justify an exception

Plans commonly allow exceptions, though the standards differ. Reasons a clinician might raise include:

  • The patient already tried the first-step drug, perhaps under a previous plan, and it did not work
  • The first-step drug caused side effects or an allergic reaction
  • It could interact with other medications
  • It is likely to be less effective or inappropriate because of the patient’s specific condition
  • The patient is stable on the requested drug, and switching could cause harm
  • The condition is serious enough that delay could be harmful

Evidence matters. Records of past treatments, dates, doses and what happened are far more persuasive than a general request.

Requesting an exception or appealing

Most plans have a process in which your clinician submits an exception request explaining why the step is not appropriate for you. Some plans have shorter timelines for urgent situations. If the request is denied, the same appeal stages that apply to other denials generally follow: an internal appeal, then external review where available. The reason given in the letter, often framed in terms of medical necessity, is worth reading closely.

Practical tips:

  • Ask your clinician’s office whether they handle exception requests regularly. Many do.
  • Keep your own record of prior medications, with dates and results, in case you change plans or providers.
  • Ask the plan what the first-step options are, and what they cost to you compared with the requested drug.
  • Ask what happens if you are already on the medication when a new plan year begins, since some plans give a transition period.

Weighing the trade-offs

Starting with a first-step treatment may suit many patients and can lower costs. At the same time, delays can matter when the condition is serious or when a person has already been through the steps. Always discuss options and risks with your clinician, who can tell you what is clinically appropriate. Do not stop or change a medication without medical advice because of a coverage rule.

The complete guide to appeals and disputes

How To Appeal A Denied Health Insurance Claim
Read the guide

Keep exploring

Guides from other topics

All topics →